“No man is good enough to judge any other man. Jesus drew a vivid picture of a man with a plank in his own eye trying to extract a speck of dust from someone else’s eye. The humour of the picture would raise a laugh which would drive the lesson home.
“Only the faultless has a right to look for faults in others. No man has a right to criticize another man unless he is prepared at least to try to do the thing he criticizes better. Every Saturday the football terracings are full of people who are violent critics, and who would yet make a pretty poor show if they themselves were to descend to the arena. Every association and every Church is full of people who are prepared to criticize from the body of the hall, or even from an arm-chair, but who would never dream of taking office themselves. The world is full of people who claim the right to be extremely vocal in criticism and totally exempt from action.
“No man has a right to criticize others unless he is prepared to venture himself in the same situation. No man is good enough to criticize his fellow-men.
“We have quite enough to do to rectify our own lives without seeking censoriously to rectify the lives of others. We would do well to concentrate on our own faults, and to leave the faults of others to God.” (>>)
1) Clare »» August 14th, 2007 @ 11:47 am
What is the logical end to this argument? That we live in a world free from moral responsibility because
there are none who are willing to demand it? Should we wait for God’s punishment while our own world
leader causes thousands of deaths with a lie, and not only a lie, but a lie that he claimed was from God
himself?
Well, I think politics is a special case. We all have a responsibility to be informed about what our government is doing and to be involved to make sure they’re representing us properly. And we need to have judgments against criminals, etc to have a just and functioning society.
I think he’s talking about more personal interactions. I don’t think he’s even really saying to not judge at all, but just to be gracious and understanding when we do judge; to give other people the same grace we would want them to give us when they judge what we do. It’s easy to defend our actions because we know all of our motives and issues and everything that went into it, but then to just look at the surface of what other people do and not try to understand what went into their decision. It’s really about the attitude you have towards other people.
I respectfully disagree with you, Ian. I do believe JEsus was telling us not to judge in that passage. I think there is a difference between judging somone and helping them. It hink this distinction is being made by Christ that if you are focused on another’s speck of dust in a judgement you better look at yourself as not measuring up and then with humility approach the other while being “plankless”.
Therefore, in applying this situation to the political field, while I am no politician, I think it means at looking at the President, for example, as a person in authority. He is a person who also makes mistakes, but furthermore, while we may not agree with him, we can respond to his leadership tactfully and humbly. Also, he is a person of authority so God’s teachings on respecting authority apply to the President as well.
I’d also agree with your comment on football fans or even distant Christ-followers. We all have judgements about what tohers are doing. I just think Christ was saying to look at our judgements through the lense of our own flaws. And ti is looking through that lense that we should approach another in love and humility. For while spurring on must still continue, We are not to spurr on in arrogance, as the Pharosees.
It doesn’t mean that I’m right and you’re wrong. It just means I respectfully disagree with some of your entry. Thanks for allowing a place for commentary. God be exaulted even through your trials and joys.
I can feel a blog entry coming on…
hehehe